![]() If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.Īs a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.īBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles. 17300 N Outer 40 Rd, Chesterfield, MO, United States, Missouri. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. Orthopedic practice specializing in sports medicine and regenerative medicine treatments to heal spor. Engaging patients in the delivery of health care has the potential to improve health outcomes and patient satisfaction.BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.īBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. ![]() MD, FAAPMR Director, Regenerative Sports Medicine, Bluetail Medical Group. Patient portals may enhance patient engagement by enabling patients to access their electronic medical records (EMRs) and facilitating secure patient-provider communication. MD Attending Physician at Regenerative Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. The aim of this study was to review literature describing patient portals tethered to an EMR in inpatient settings, their role in patient engagement, and their impact on health care delivery in order to identify factors and best practices for successful implementation of this technology and areas that require further research.Ī systematic search for articles in the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases was conducted using keywords associated with patient engagement, electronic health records, and patient portals and their respective subject headings in each database. Articles for inclusion were evaluated for quality using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) for systematic review articles and the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs for empirical studies. Included studies were categorized by their focus on input factors (eg, portal design), process factors (eg, portal use), and output factors (eg, benefits) and by the valence of their findings regarding patient portals (ie, positive, negative, or mixed). The systematic search identified 58 articles for inclusion. The inputs category was addressed by 40 articles, while the processes and outputs categories were addressed by 36 and 46 articles, respectively: 47 articles addressed multiple themes across the three categories, and 11 addressed only a single theme. Nineteen articles had high- to very high-quality, 21 had medium quality, and 18 had low- to very low-quality. Find contact's direct phone number, email address, work history, and more. Findings in the inputs category showed wide-ranging portal designs patients' privacy concerns and lack of encouragement from providers were among portal adoption barriers while information access and patient-provider communication were among facilitators. View Anna Schroeder's business profile as Functional Medicine Medical Assistant at Bluetail Medical Group. Several methods were used to train portal users with varying success. ![]() ![]() In the processes category, sociodemographic characteristics and medical conditions of patients were predictors of portal use some patients wanted unlimited access to their EMRs, personalized health education, and nonclinical information and patients were keen to use portals for communicating with their health care teams. In the outputs category, some but not all studies found patient portals improved patient engagement patients perceived some portal functions as inadequate but others as useful patients and staff thought portals may improve patient care but could cause anxiety in some patients and portals improved patient safety, adherence to medications, and patient-provider communication but had no impact on objective health outcomes. While the evidence is currently immature, patient portals have demonstrated benefit by enabling the discovery of medical errors, improving adherence to medications, and providing patient-provider communication, etc. High-quality studies are needed to fully understand, improve, and evaluate their impact.ĭigital hospital electronic health record electronic medical record patient engagement patient portal. ©Ronald Dendere, Christine Slade, Andrew Burton-Jones, Clair Sullivan, Andrew Staib, Monika Janda. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (). Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Griffin A, Skinner A, Thornhill J, Weinberger M.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |